Samsung在i9000 Galaxy S當中(如上圖)，也開始將內建程式的icon改以統一形狀處理，但是不確定從AppMarket當中下載的軟體，是不是也會自動加上形狀底色。不然如果同時有固定和不規則形狀出現，其實反而是更亂，但是自行加上的底色是否會干擾到軟體icon的設計，也會是個問題。
上面這二點雖然都是小地方，但是卻影響到了一些自己對於這二個系統的評價，因為在整體介面使用思考的方向上，自己比較喜歡iPhone的部份。但是Android手機也的確是相當優秀的智慧型手機系統，跟早先推出的WM和Symbian比起來，優點是多更多，不同的設計方向或許可以吸引到不同的族群，其實只要是自己覺得好用就是好系統了，不過Android 2.2的3G to wifi功能相當吸引我，至少不用像iPhone要JB才能辦到(雖然現在JB破解都做得很簡單了)。
While the iPhone and Android are recognized in these two very good full touch phone, but is still prefer their own iPhone interface design, and some friends would ask why, after hearing, here on the cause of them feel so different from most, The 2:00 written down, of course, may have been some personal preferences problems, but I use these two kinds of systems experience, finishing it up.
1. Interface metaphors and physical buttons
To interface design for people who can interface to achieve expression of the function buttons do not rely much as possible, so the design of the interface, often with graphic metaphors to replace the borrowing entity function button (shown above [ 1] part). The iOS interface will be the expression of this concept to the extreme, the machine front has only one button (or several side wants to), other functions must rely on the software's interface to be realized. The concept of Android, sucked "Previous" "menu", "Home" and "Search" button on the main four functions in order to achieve (as shown above  part).iPhone is designed to make it easier for entities to achieve simple machines, and software and system design features among the interface of the button. The Android's design is more eclectic, the common functions or independent.
Actually, two kinds of uses has advantages and disadvantages, such as over iPhone metaphor, may cause a necessary function in the face of time, must be through learning to understand (such as some functions in accordance with the second Home button, or screen captures with the need in the function key).The Android is the more traditional mobile phone design patterns, but occasionally encountered in the program their own user interface which will be because they do not know what to hit the wrong button on the situation. Although the Nexus One in the body is very simple design, and and his following in the used Tatoo think Android is a very good system, but personally, prefer to think the iPhone in the integrated hardware and software design concepts.
2. Software ICON graphic recognition and page design
This issue should also be personal preference, when the smart phone software is not much time difference between the two is not great. But when installing the software started more often, feel that a situation occurs, that is, the shape of Android's graphic icon as the iPhone does not have a fixed shape (as shown above ), in the face of a pile when looking for software , graphics, irregular contour are often disturbing to read icon software under the name of the text (as Figure ).
Part of your desktop, iPhone interfaces for all the software from scratch to begin with page mode display, desktop configuration and the order to use iTunes for the more convenient way (although only the function is later). Android as between the desktop and the software library is separate from the use of, and then add a shortcut to the desktop when it will no longer be irregular graphics interference. HTC Sense program using the new shortcut to the desktop, only to the software name appears in the text list ways to deal with individuals that are not ideal, because the program will encounter familiar names not remember the software library and then go back to check the issue again .
Samsung i9000 Galaxy S in which (as shown above ), also began to change built into the program icon to unify the shape processing, but not sure which to download the software from the AppMarket, is not it will automatically add the shape of background color. Otherwise, if both fixed and irregular shape, in fact the contrary is more chaotic, but on their own with the background color will interfere with the design of the software icon it will be a problem.
Although these two points above are a small place, but it affects some of their evaluation for these two systems, because the interface used to think the overall direction, and that they prefer the iPhone part. But the Android phone is very good indeed smart phone system, with the launch of WM and Symbian earlier compared it to the advantage of many more different design direction may attract different ethnic groups, in fact, is useful as long as they feel a good system, but Android 2.2 of 3G to wifi are quite appealing to me, at least not like the iPhone to JB to do (though now JB has done very well break easy).